BTC /r/btc has now reached 250,000 subscribers! |
- /r/btc has now reached 250,000 subscribers!
- Hey everyone! YSK that BitcoinCashJ (Bitcoin Cash Java library) has been updated by @ProtocolCash (Twitter) to support CTOR! I (@pokkst) then made some more changes myself, such as: standard derivation path m/44'/145'/0', cashaddrs by default, and sending to Cash Accounts!
- Meanwhile over at r/bitcoinsv...
- A marketing question for the community:
- TIL there is a notary service in BCH
- When did the original censorship/misinformation start?
- Code Sector is now accepting Bitcoin Cash for purchasing their software
- Documentation for upgrading to Badger v0.6.0. Includes steps and screenshots for consolidating secondary accounts.
- The BSV chain has just experienced a 6-block reorg
- This must've been an entertaining conversation between Craig Wright and his lawyers!
- Buying burgers with Bitcoin Cash (Cucuta, Colombia)
- EXTREME CAUTION ALERT: EZBTC Exchange (Please upvote for visibility)
- The million dollar question: can BTC still hard fork for bigger blocks in the future? Because if not...
- The evolution of r/bitcoin
- Just dug this up. This is ironic as hell
- Bitcoin Cash Development video meeting #8 - April 18, 2019
- Now over 1000 BCH Simple tokens! More than 50 tokens created in the last 24hrs. The Tokambrian Explosion is well underway!
- US 2020 Presidential Candidate promises to provide better regulatory clarity on cryptocurrency market
- Peter McCormack: I'm getting sued by a couple of billionaires for saying words.
- Statistics Show Bitcoin Cash Is a Strong Contender After Crypto Winter
- Calvin Ayre talking out his ass about "regular 128MB blocks", drops spicy NEW MEME
- Graphene v2 Interim Report
- Graphene V2 Report Shows Mass On-Chain Scaling Progress, 1GB Blocks Possible on Basic Hardware
- Emin Gün Sirer: "Indeed, Bitcoin maximalism stems from deep-seated insecurities about the underlying, unscalable tech. Adults can calmly respond to criticisms. Maximalists' signature move is to freak out, brigade, and try to shout down all perceived naysayers, which betrays their insecurity."
- r/btc about to break 250k subscribers!
- Purse.io's Bitcoin Cash implementation BCash could still need some help from experienced JS devs. They're not ready for the may hardfork yet!
/r/btc has now reached 250,000 subscribers! Posted: 18 Apr 2019 02:22 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 18 Apr 2019 03:48 PM PDT
| ||
Meanwhile over at r/bitcoinsv... Posted: 19 Apr 2019 12:16 AM PDT
| ||
A marketing question for the community: Posted: 18 Apr 2019 05:17 PM PDT Other than needing a few more translations, our Bitcoin Cash point of sale app is ready for Android. (iOS soon) You can download it here. My question is, what should we call and market it as? Some current ideas are:
Please give me your thoughts for the best name. [link] [comments] | ||
TIL there is a notary service in BCH Posted: 19 Apr 2019 12:22 AM PDT
| ||
When did the original censorship/misinformation start? Posted: 19 Apr 2019 12:28 AM PDT Hello, Bitcoin came into existence in 2009 (WP 08) What was the first forum/website? - Bitcoin Talk forums? When did the Thrymos/blockstream/BTC Cult censorship start? What year? What else happened from 2009 to Aug 2017 (relating to censorship only) Is the following correct; R / Bitcoin = BTC with heavy censorship R / Bitcoin Begginers = BTC with censorship R / BTC = This - which is pro BCH but open for all to discuss Bitcoin Org = BTC? correct? Who owns @Bitcoin - BCH or BTC? Who owns Bitcoin Talk forums - BTC? Thank you [link] [comments] | ||
Code Sector is now accepting Bitcoin Cash for purchasing their software Posted: 18 Apr 2019 09:14 PM PDT | ||
Posted: 18 Apr 2019 10:26 PM PDT
| ||
The BSV chain has just experienced a 6-block reorg Posted: 18 Apr 2019 08:31 AM PDT
| ||
This must've been an entertaining conversation between Craig Wright and his lawyers! Posted: 18 Apr 2019 02:02 PM PDT Here is Craig's latest filing.
This is what it's in reference to. [link] [comments] | ||
Buying burgers with Bitcoin Cash (Cucuta, Colombia) Posted: 18 Apr 2019 02:26 PM PDT
| ||
EXTREME CAUTION ALERT: EZBTC Exchange (Please upvote for visibility) Posted: 18 Apr 2019 02:02 PM PDT Posting here to warn my fellow Canadians, especially after the QuadrigaCX fiasco. A precursory search around Reddit will reveal many users also having issues with the ezBTC exchange. Canada has limited options for exchanges, and personally, I recommend sticking with Coinbase because albeit their higher fees, you gain peace of mind. Please upvote for visibility. I will keep this information general as David Smillie founder of ezBTC has threatened to sue me, and I am currently waiting for such papers to arrive so it can argued in a courtroom. Anybody else who has been threatened with a lawsuit from David Smillie, please remember that Canadian libel and slander laws only apply if you make FALSE written or oral statements. If the information is factual, you have contravened no libel or slander laws. But if your money is being withheld by ezBTC, you definitely have grounds to sue him and his company. Been a long time customer of EZBTC since 2017 with no complaints until now. I took a long break from the space and recently decided to make another small purchase from ezBTC for XMR since the BTC price spreads are ridiculously expensive. The customer service has completely changed since that time. My emails to [info@ezbtc.ca](mailto:info@ezbtc.ca) went unanswered, the live chat is disabled, and the phone numbers 1-877-755-2249 & 1-604-398-4024 listed on the website go straight to voicemail. I got worried from the lack of communication and decided to message them on Twitter @ezbtccanada as I saw they were active on that platform. Not even 30 minutes later, I received an email from David Smillie [dave@ezbtc.ca](mailto:dave@ezbtc.ca) himself giving me a number to call him at. He suspended my account for "security reasons" and marked my account back down to "unverified" after being a long time customer with zero issues. Lots of unanswered emails and calls later I finally got through to him. I asked for clarification regarding these security issues because only I, the owner, would have access to the original email, 2fa code, and ezbtc login/password. My phone number has also been updated since that time, but I see no option on the website to change it as of April 18, 2019. I was also willing to resubmit my documents for the KYC process again. Nonetheless it wasn't needed and he assured me all was fine and reverified my account on the spot. He told me that staff would take a look at my account the next day noon EST (today) and would send out my withdrawal. I thanked him, removed my tweets, and thought all was well. Fast forward to today and there's still no update. My calls, emails, and texts go unanswered. Sent another tweet instead. Surprisingly, I received a call from David shortly after and he was livid. He threatened to sue me if I continued tweeting. He told me that my account is banned indefinitely and that an eTransfer (Canadian method) refund for my money would be provided in "30 days" so we'll see if he ever sends it. He stated more information would be included in an email I'm supposed to receive on Monday April 22, 2019. He blocked me on twitter and also says he's keen to find me on Reddit, so I'm sure he'll be reading this. Hi David! I will update this post as developments come in and whether or not he refunds my money. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ These are the two tweets I sent that in David's eyes, are grounds for defamation: Still waiting on 📷📷CAUTION ALERT: Still have not received my funds after ezBTC founder David Smillie ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TLDR: ezBTC still has my money. Support is non-existent, use Twitter instead @ezbtccanada [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 18 Apr 2019 05:27 PM PDT ... it appears increasingly clear that whatever LN manages to achieve in the end, layer 1 will need to be increased in capacity for the system to work well as a cash system (as we all know). So there are two avenues really: will they be able to hard fork down the road to increase their block size (they'd find an excuse...), or will they not? I'm thinking that with coins stuck in LN channels, they probably CANNOT hard fork anymore which would mean they'd be sc-ewed - but is that so? What do technical experts say about that? 🤔 Thanks! [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 19 Apr 2019 01:18 AM PDT
| ||
Just dug this up. This is ironic as hell Posted: 18 Apr 2019 11:44 AM PDT
| ||
Bitcoin Cash Development video meeting #8 - April 18, 2019 Posted: 18 Apr 2019 10:22 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 18 Apr 2019 01:34 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 19 Apr 2019 12:41 AM PDT
| ||
Peter McCormack: I'm getting sued by a couple of billionaires for saying words. Posted: 18 Apr 2019 08:38 AM PDT
| ||
Statistics Show Bitcoin Cash Is a Strong Contender After Crypto Winter Posted: 18 Apr 2019 01:48 PM PDT
| ||
Calvin Ayre talking out his ass about "regular 128MB blocks", drops spicy NEW MEME Posted: 18 Apr 2019 04:17 PM PDT Only a day before a massive 6-block deep reorganization of the SV chain, due to the unsuccessful propagation of a single 128MB BSV block (translation: "BSV no worky"), Calvin dropped the absolute gem of the year, second only to Greg Maxwell's "champaign" and Adam Back's "TABS". EDIT: First meme arrived EDIT: And the second [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 18 Apr 2019 05:50 AM PDT For the past six months, our team at UMass (in conjunction with the Bitcoin Unlimited team) has been working on various improvements to the Graphene protocol, which we're calling "Graphene v2". The project is broken into two phases. Phase 1 introduces various security and performance improvements, while phase 2 implements failure recovery and mempool synchronization. As of last week, phase 1 is complete except for two documentation tasks, and will be rolled out with BU release 1.6.0. Accordingly, I thought that now would be a good time to summarize and quantify the impact of the work that will be included in the release. To that end, I've written an interim report (if this link fails to render, then please try this one instead). Here are some of the highlights from that report.
The report includes a test that we ran on over 500 sequential blocks from mainnet. During that test, we experienced 2 decode failures and were forced to request missing transactions 4 times. The overall mean compression rate was 0.995. For blocks with more than 1000 transactions, the mean compression rate was 0.998. The largest block, containing 2545 transactions, had a compression rate of 0.999. [link] [comments] | ||
Graphene V2 Report Shows Mass On-Chain Scaling Progress, 1GB Blocks Possible on Basic Hardware Posted: 18 Apr 2019 12:03 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 18 Apr 2019 07:30 AM PDT
| ||
r/btc about to break 250k subscribers! Posted: 18 Apr 2019 03:02 AM PDT Congratulations to everyone who contributes to and supports this sub with uncensored debate and open mod logs. [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 18 Apr 2019 07:56 AM PDT
|
You are subscribed to email updates from Bitcoin - The Internet of Money. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment