• Breaking News

    Wednesday, May 2, 2018

    Home Unlabelled Litecoin Demo - Litecoin Wallet on Wirex

    Litecoin Demo - Litecoin Wallet on Wirex

    May 02, 2018

    Litecoin Demo - Litecoin Wallet on Wirex

    Demo - Litecoin Wallet on Wirex

    Posted: 02 May 2018 10:43 AM PDT

    I joined the club!!!

    Posted: 01 May 2018 05:01 PM PDT

    I've been pronouncing the name of this coin all wrong.

    Posted: 02 May 2018 10:54 AM PDT

    It's not "lite" coin. It's "lit' ecoin. Like electronic coin on fire!

    submitted by /u/spritefire
    [link] [comments]

    LoafWallet Issues

    Posted: 02 May 2018 08:51 AM PDT

    I have tried to log in to my account and it asks for the 12 word paper key. I enter the 12 words and it says invalid. I tried emailing support but it says their inbox is full. I need to access my coins but cannot recover the wallet. I only had to enter my PIN in the past, what is going on??

    submitted by /u/lambo0125
    [link] [comments]

    Could Litecoin ever do a soft fork and add Monero privacy?

    Posted: 02 May 2018 01:13 AM PDT

    I just listened to Edward Snowden say Bitcoin's biggest problems aren't scaling. Its privacy.

    https://youtu.be/_Iisu0snIL0?t=50m9s

    So being that Litecoin can add features more easily than bitcoin, do you guys think it'll ever add monero features? I know they're planning to add Confidential Transactions. But as I understand it, they can still see some things with that.

    submitted by /u/dapppunk
    [link] [comments]

    The Future of Bitcoin: What Lightning Could Look Like

    Posted: 02 May 2018 11:28 AM PDT

    Litecoin Marketing - I Need Your Help

    Posted: 01 May 2018 09:56 PM PDT

    I'm looking for honest feedback from those of you who are unhappy with the current "marketing" state of Litecoin. I see comments here and on YouTube A LOT about how Charlie is a terrible marketer. So my question is:

    What exactly do you want to see? In a picture perfect world, what would happen in terms of "marketing"?

    submitted by /u/cryptocapitalventure
    [link] [comments]

    Asic mining t-shirt and mug that I designed on Amazon.

    Posted: 02 May 2018 12:13 PM PDT

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07CRPQYJT

    Processing img yq0v48kzrhv01...

    submitted by /u/Crypto-Dabs
    [link] [comments]

    I interviewed Coinbase on their thoughts about cryptocurrency acceptance amongst merchants...

    Posted: 02 May 2018 12:12 PM PDT

    Happy Litecoin Day!

    Posted: 01 May 2018 02:29 PM PDT

    FastTech.com Now Accepts LTC as Payment

    Posted: 01 May 2018 08:54 PM PDT

    looking to accept litecoin as payment at Restaurant

    Posted: 01 May 2018 02:15 PM PDT

    I want to start accepting litecoin at my pizza shop. I have some concerns though.

    I understand it is as easy as printing a QR code. The customer then can scan the QR code, get the litecoin address and send the appropriate amount of litecoin to my wallets address.

    Our restaurant gets very busy, these transactions aren't exactly quick and easy to confirm in a restaurant setting where the server is constantly running and making drinks and what not.

    Does anyone here own a restaurant and accept litecoin as payment?

    Does it interfere with the flow of your servers?

    How do you confirm that the transaction went through without giving your server access to your wallet?

    Do you simply look at the customers wallet and see that they sent, say $49.74 in litecoin to your addess?

    Can't that pending transaction be denied eventually even though the customers wallet says it sent the litecoin?

    I'm just worried if i start accepting litecoin it could be really burdensome on our servers and managers and might slow them down...

    submitted by /u/spedellis
    [link] [comments]

    Was Charlie right about Ethereum? EIP 999 related.

    Posted: 01 May 2018 06:14 PM PDT

    I remember some time back Charlie referring to Ethereum as a "hacker's playground". Now, with the basically accidental usurping of a smart contract wallet that held funds by a user on gitbhub, it seems that Charlie might be right. And, if he's right about ETH, will these same principle's maybe hold true for EOS, Lisk, ADA etc.

    Was this a case of too much too soon? Should the blockchain and it's applications be focusing on getting one thing right first such as transnational coins, making them user friendly etc. and then focus on delving into more complex, universal Dapps later? I'm genuinely asking. I'm not like a prodigy engineer. Just a crypto enthusiast watching this all play out and understanding it as well as I can.

    I'm not happy this happened as I do hold ETH and it seems that this could be bad for being an ETH HODLer depending on how this EIP 867/ EIP 999 turns out. But on the other hand, something has always told me that Charlie is a smart cookie and right now I feel smarter in a way for sticking with LTC over glitzy, big promise coins because everything from Nano to ETH to XVG seems to have fairly significant problems while LTC and BTC are rock solid.

    submitted by /u/I_am_Jax_account
    [link] [comments]

    Still say Charlie "might" be Nakamoto.

    Posted: 01 May 2018 08:27 PM PDT

    Charlie just tweeted his reputation and legacy were extremely important to him. The MOST important thing - more than money. AND then he went on to say that he had more skin in the (crypto) game than EVERYONE ELSE COMBINED.

    Pretty interesting statements given he has admitted to always having more BTC than LTC. Maybe money doesn't matter that much to him because he has billions. Maybe most of his skin is BTC.

    lt would explain a ton of things. He and Roger go way back and Charlie can never fully bring himself to rip Roger really badly. He only rips Bcash and not that badly. Nakamoto really owes Roger a lot and will likely be forever grateful to him.

    Charlie is a bit hyper sensitive about what people think of him. Nakamoto seemed to be the same. Charlie looks forward to stepping away. Nakamoto did.

    Charlie is absolutely devoted to the gospel that Litecoin is silver to Bitcoin's gold. From the beginning he has seen them as married coins. He never even jokes that Litecoin should just replace Bitcoin one day. He never puts Litecoin's importance in front of Bitcoin.

    Charlie is well connected to all the key exchange players. Why did Coinbase say yes to little ol $8 Litecoin at the time? Maybe Nakamoto privately told them he was the creator of Litecoin. Maybe Nakamoto thinks BCH has its place in the crypto world too - Charlie certainly preaches this.

    Wrap your head around this: Charlie still hodls that original Bitcoin which he always said was MORE than any amount of Litecoin he ever held. There appears to be an old post by him that he probably should have gotten up to an even one million Litecoin, just to make it an even feel good number. What if Charlie has more than 1M BTC? Whatever number it is he has that much BCH? But has he sold out of all these positions to decentralize these coins?

    Why didn't/doesn't Charlie decide to announce he selling all his BCH and giving those proceeds to the Litecoin Foundation? Again, it would advance the decentralization issue AND HELP LITECOIN. A ton of headscraching things with Charlie sort of make sense if he is Nakamoto or very close to him.

    submitted by /u/danpolage
    [link] [comments]

    A Tangled Web: Will Coinbase Ventures Lead to Conflicts of Interest?

    Posted: 01 May 2018 10:32 PM PDT

    Just a random thought i was playing with today about Charlie's poll(not FOMO or speculation, just toying with ideas). Read full idea in comment below, tell me what you think.

    Posted: 01 May 2018 03:38 PM PDT
    Read more
    at

    No comments:

    Post a Comment