• Breaking News

    Wednesday, May 30, 2018

    Home Unlabelled Litecoin Bought silver with Litecoin

    Litecoin Bought silver with Litecoin

    May 30, 2018

    Litecoin Bought silver with Litecoin

    Bought silver with Litecoin

    Posted: 29 May 2018 05:09 PM PDT

    @SatoshiLite: In lite of recent 51% attacks and http://crypto51.app info, rest assured that the Litecoin is extremely secure and mining is very healthy. ����

    Posted: 30 May 2018 01:43 AM PDT

    LND v0.4.2-beta has just been released!

    Posted: 30 May 2018 03:13 AM PDT

    Litecoin: The Hot New Mining Sensation

    Posted: 30 May 2018 11:53 AM PDT

    These merchants accept payment in Litecoin

    Posted: 30 May 2018 05:26 AM PDT

    Coinbase commerce - Have we chosen the right crypto payment processor?

    Posted: 29 May 2018 02:35 PM PDT

    As a strong believer that litecoin will become THE currency, I decided to pull my weight by adding support for paying with Litecoin in our e-commerce store. However, I currently did this via Coinbase Commerce, and would like to know if this is the right processor to use right now, or if BitPay for example is superior?

    Does anyone have any experience? Most preferably from a customer/visitor POV.

    submitted by /u/abled
    [link] [comments]

    TravelbyBit Launches Digital Currency Ready Retail Stores at Brisbane Airport #PayWithLitecoin

    Posted: 29 May 2018 09:07 PM PDT

    Transaction volume

    Posted: 30 May 2018 07:05 AM PDT

    Where can I find the chart of Litecoin transaction volume overtime?

    submitted by /u/shwekhaw
    [link] [comments]

    Litecoin - Abe

    Posted: 30 May 2018 12:10 AM PDT

    Hi there

    Is there someone who successfully run litecoin on bitcoin abe / abe. I used this as my chain config.

    CHAIN_CONFIG = [{"chain":"Litecoin", "code3":"LTC", "address_version":"0x30", "magic":"\xfb\xc0\xb6\xdb"}]

    But im getting this error:

    Opened /home/ubuntu/.litecoin/blocks/blk00046.dat

    Exception at 3652130237

    Failed to catch up {'blkfile_offset': 29167380, 'blkfile_number': 100046, 'chain_id': 1, 'loader': None, 'conf': u'/home/ubuntu/.litecoin/litecoin.conf', 'dirname': '/home/ubuntu/.litecoin', 'id': Decimal('439')}

    Traceback (most recent call last):

    >! File "Abe/DataStore.py", line 2530, in catch_up!<

    store.catch_up_dir(dircfg)

    >! File "Abe/DataStore.py", line 2828, in catch_up_dir!<

    store.import_blkdat(dircfg, ds, blkfile['name'])

    >! File "Abe/DataStore.py", line 2950, in import_blkdat!<

    b = chain.ds_parse_block(ds)

    >! File "Abe/Chain/__init__.py", line 82, in ds_parse_block!<

    d['transactions'].append(chain.ds_parse_transaction(ds))

    >! File "Abe/Chain/__init__.py", line 75, in ds_parse_transaction!<

    return deserialize.parse_Transaction(ds)

    >! File "Abe/deserialize.py", line 90, in parse_Transaction!<

    d['txIn'].append(parse_TxIn(vds))

    >! File "Abe/deserialize.py", line 46, in parse_TxIn!<

    d['sequence'] = vds.read_uint32()

    >! File "Abe/BCDataStream.py", line 71, in read_uint32!<

    def read_uint32 (self): return self._read_num('<I')!<

    >! File "Abe/BCDataStream.py", line 110, in _read_num!<

    (i,) = struct.unpack_from(format, self.input, self.read_cursor)

    error: unpack_from requires a buffer of at least 4 bytes

    submitted by /u/mjbquieta
    [link] [comments]

    @LTCFoundation: Any NYC or Boston-based #Litecoin enthusiasts who'd be interested in volunteering some time for a project with us? Leave a comment.

    Posted: 29 May 2018 03:00 PM PDT

    Any Italians in here?

    Posted: 29 May 2018 05:39 PM PDT

    Just curious if anyone in Italy is now looking towards crypto since the latest government upheaval.

    submitted by /u/Absintheuphoric
    [link] [comments]

    You may not be able to buy/sell Bitcoin completely anonymously, but some ways do protect your privacy more than others. This video shows 5 ways you can try purchasing bitcoins anonymously!

    Posted: 30 May 2018 02:27 AM PDT

    What about that 51%?

    Posted: 29 May 2018 05:49 PM PDT

    What if LTC becomes a real deal, wouldn't that include big players in mininig as well, and we end up with pools which are only profitable if they are huge? I mean, every industry eventually ends up with at most 3-4 major players, and many small ones.

    Is there a mechanism one could use in order to prevent 2-3 major ones to create 51% attack?

    submitted by /u/mirekti
    [link] [comments]

    Protecting Litecoin from 51% attacks

    Posted: 30 May 2018 12:25 AM PDT

    After reading the news article about just how easy it would be to 51% a lot of coins (roughly $64,000 for a 1hr attack on LTC) there is a solution which I think we should look into.

    Any coins which are able to be 51% attacked can easily take advantage of our dPoW (delayed Proof of Work). Komodo notarizes blockchains to the highest hashrate (currently bitcoin, but can change to any other blockchain when necessary)

    For only 300 KMD a year ($900), any blockchain can notarize to Komodo, who then notarize to the Bitcoin. This solves the problem of all the recent 51% attacks.

    Notarization "protects" in the sense that you must 51% attack BTC to get around delayed Proof-of-Work, and yes, it's impossible for notaries to be outmined, the code has their pubkeys hardcoded, they get special treatment.

    Also, a 51% attack against KMD must be done within a 10 minute window, if your attack takes 15 minutes, you are screwed because that is how often BTC blocks come out, which have KMD metadata embedded in them (merkle roots)

    https://komodoplatform.com/blockchain-security-the-role-of-a-notary-node/

    https://github.com/SuperNETorg/komodo/wiki/Delayed-Proof-of-Work-(dPoW)-Whitepaper

    Also don't forget about their barterDEX which you can atomic swap LTC pairing with any other coins without a middleman 🙂

    submitted by /u/_kaichi
    [link] [comments]
    Read more
    at

    No comments:

    Post a Comment