BTC The mistake the Bitcoin Cash community is making |
- The mistake the Bitcoin Cash community is making
- Security researcher Troy Hunt has updated his Bitcoin Cash donation address to CashAddress, suggests followers "make sure it works".
- The TRUTH About Bitcoin In El Salvador
- What's the difference between BTC and BCH?
- Uncomfortable truth: Brandolini's Law explains what this sub is up against
- “… but doesn't it concern Crypto veterans that the CEO and CFO of a $70 billion enterprise that forms the bedrock of retail crypto trading are uncontactable post a Bloomberg article?”
- Bitcoin Cash report by The etc group. Notes new users and adoption accelerating despite decreased pricing. Development achieving goals and future looking very bright.
- Top 10 Trading Volume in the last 24 hours
- When was the last time you convinced a business to accept BCH?
- Power up your Flipstarter campaign with a Flip Dash!
- New smartbch dex launched today
- Blockstream Report, enjoy!
- BIG Shout out to Satochip sponsoring Bitcoin Cash MythBusting 2021! More prizes:5 BCH Satochip wallets and its chip readers to Top 5 entries. Don't miss out on the chance to earn BCH busting small blocker myths about Bitcoin and others.
- Central banks set prices. It's what they do. The price of BTC is higher than it should be because central bank functionaries are buying BTC right now.
- The Bitcoin Cash Podcast #30: Maximalism & BCH vs XRG feat. Karol Licho Trzeszczkowski
- If you want to scale Bitcoin while preserving the unique properties that make Bitcoin disruptive, you must scale the cash layer
- UTXO commitments in BCH clients
- “I’m not using Tether so I’m safe” Are you using bitcoin? Crypto exchanges? “DeFi”? crypto “lending”? You’re using Tether. You’re exposed to Tether.”
- “ Funny to see CEOs like Adam Back and @muneeb pushing "bitcoin NFTs" on their bitcoin adjacent networks while rare pepes, spells of genesis, bitcorn cards, etc. built directly on bitcoin via @CounterpartyXCP have already won the hearts and minds of the NFTverse.”
- ELI5 of the last BCH Network Discussion on Oct 6th is available!
- BTC fanboys refusing to listen to critics
- Fake news alert. Bitcoin ETF not approved. Instead an ETF holding shares of companies you can already just purchase on the stock market was approved (including shares such as MicroStrategy and Marathon Digital Holdings). Which is no big deal.
- “ Matrixport, founded by Jihan Wu, announced that it will stop providing services to users in mainland China on October 15.”
- Why do you think BCH can succeed against alternatives like XLM or NANO?
- We need your support. Bitcoin Cash Animal Rescue.
The mistake the Bitcoin Cash community is making Posted: 12 Oct 2021 01:47 AM PDT The major mistake the Bitcoin Cash community is making is their seeming inability to talk about BCH without a reference to BTC.
I want to read or hear BCH without a mention of BTC. BCH should be presented and sold on its own merit and not on the failures of another cryptocurrency (BTC). Is that too hard or impossible to do? [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 12 Oct 2021 01:09 AM PDT
| ||
The TRUTH About Bitcoin In El Salvador Posted: 11 Oct 2021 08:58 PM PDT
| ||
What's the difference between BTC and BCH? Posted: 11 Oct 2021 08:47 PM PDT Like aren't they the same? one is bitcoin while the other is bitcoin cash,, and are they interchangable [link] [comments] | ||
Uncomfortable truth: Brandolini's Law explains what this sub is up against Posted: 12 Oct 2021 01:39 AM PDT The insightful Brandolini's Law states: The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude larger than to produce it.This sub - in fact, the entire Bitcoin experiment - is like a case study in Brandolini's Law. No matter what we say or do, it's trivial to manufacture hordes of bullshit-spreaders who, with almost no effort at all, derail useful discussion and effortlessly spread disinformation at will. Debunking the disinformation requires actual effort: reading, thinking, making informed logical arguments, finding and posting links to sources, writing with some degree of precision... That's not trivial. But the opponent doesn't care, nor is the opponent forced to perform similar work. The opponent merely has to shrug off your hard work and logic with another low-effort bullshit reply, and once again they've forced you to expend another order of magnitude more energy trying to debunk the new bullshit. When I reflect back on a certain person's claim that they had already proven to themself that decentralized consensus was impossible, I have to wonder, is this what they were referring to? Because it's trivial to disrupt consensus with bullshit, and it's an order of magnitude easier to manufacture bullshit than it is to debunk it? Therefore it's always easier to disrupt consensus, than to build it? If so, I must admit, I'm starting to wonder if they were maybe right about that after all. Because in the end, it's been an uphill battle for eight years now, and while I'm becoming weary of debunking the same disinformation over and over, the hordes of bullshit-spreaders keep coming like Zombies of the Apocalypse. The original Bitcoin: a Peer-to-peer Electronic Cash System project lives on in this sub. But only just barely. Unfortunately I'm coming to the conclusion that that guy may have been right. Decentralized consensus - meaning, uncensored / uncurated consensus without an authority which will remove the effortless bullshit-spreaders who can trivially disrupt consensus - may in fact be impossible, thanks to Brandolini's Law. Not only does this have serious implications for all decentralized crypto projects, but for humanity at large. It is depressing. Thanks for attending my sad Ted talk. [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 12 Oct 2021 02:55 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 11 Oct 2021 10:46 AM PDT
| ||
Top 10 Trading Volume in the last 24 hours Posted: 11 Oct 2021 03:03 PM PDT
| ||
When was the last time you convinced a business to accept BCH? Posted: 12 Oct 2021 02:45 AM PDT This is the crucial question. And it's the only one that really matters. I remember my own ambitions to push adoption back in 2010-2013. After that a lot of "internal" discussions started to fracture Bitcoin and the crypto space began to develop in different directions. Which in the end is a net positive. The main toll however was that people stopped to focus on adoption in everyday live. Now if everybody in this sub convinces only one business/merchant per year to accept BCH/XMR, the sound and private money revolution will be guaranteed to take place within this decade. [link] [comments] | ||
Power up your Flipstarter campaign with a Flip Dash! Posted: 11 Oct 2021 02:16 PM PDT
| ||
New smartbch dex launched today Posted: 11 Oct 2021 01:21 PM PDT | ||
Posted: 11 Oct 2021 10:45 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 11 Oct 2021 01:31 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 11 Oct 2021 07:28 PM PDT The biggest fiat buyers in the world are central bankers who can create money, as well as their chosen recipients (authorities, militaries, Wall Streeters, opinion-molders, influencers, politicians, presstitutes, universities, and others). Private money is the competition. Once central bankers were convinced that BTC would never be peer-to-peer electronic cash, they leapt into bitcoin with both feet. They had Adam and the gang holding the door. So they seed funded exchanges and indices and news sites and high frequency traders and chain analysis firms. And by 2017 bankers had purchased huge interests in Litecoin and several other projects. They were conducting dirty smear campaigns against at least one project and group of developers who weren't for sale. Also by this time they were funding many new cryptocurrency projects, some with a purpose, but mostly to diffuse or trivialize or tribalize the user space. After this and more, today, legacy financial interests have an infrastructure with which they can pump and dump the price of BTC for as long as people still use their notes. It is all being done to prevent groundswell adoption of peer-to-peer electronic cash, which is fast, easy, reliable, available, and which could easily end central banker regimes tomorrow. If they do not act. In other words, private central bank regimes around the world simply have little other choice to do what they are doing. Currency wars and dirty tricks are not unfamiliar to them. Bitcoin Cash is performing so well in this environment, you really have to sit back and marvel. The many pumps and dumps I'm following may be profitable today, but they are like shadows on the wall when it comes to predicting tomorrow. BCH is the closest thing we have to New Money. [link] [comments] | ||
The Bitcoin Cash Podcast #30: Maximalism & BCH vs XRG feat. Karol Licho Trzeszczkowski Posted: 11 Oct 2021 12:22 PM PDT This week I am joined by Karol Trzeszczkowski, the founder of Ergon (XRG), a fork of Bitcoin Cash focussed on maintaining a stable value. We talk about cryptocurrency maximalism, debate BCH vs XRG, getting into the weeds on volatility and adoption of cryptocurrency, plus news of the BCH Bull, BitBalancer and US Bank adopting crypto. Price: 1.8mBCH, free in a week. [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 11 Oct 2021 08:11 AM PDT First, if you haven't done so, start by reading at least the first two pages of the Bitcoin white paper. So why is Bitcoin special? The purpose (and value) of the system is that it enables any two willing parties to make "casual transactions" over the internet with no need of a third party who can de-permission the transaction. That is the "electronic cash system." How does cash work? We all understand it intuitively as "Alice hands Bob a $20." But since a digital $20 could be perfectly copied, some sort of authority is required to authenticate that the $20 is valid. The white paper goes on to describe the architecture of a system which implements the electronic cash system using a distributed timestamp server, modeled on the centralized system described on page 2. The system accepts only the first-seen version of a transaction. In this way, the system models "Alice hands Bob a $20" but distributes the validation mechanism so that there is no central point of failure or censorship. The cashlike nature of transactions is a product of the system's architecture. It is clearly possible to construct payment systems (such as Lightning Network) on top of the cash system. However, transactions conducted on such payment systems no longer enjoy the cashlike nature provided by the underlying network, but instead are subject to the architectural nature of the layered payment system. In the case of Lightning, the model is not cash, but routed IOUs modeled on bank payment routing and settlement. The point is that if you want to scale the cash system, you must scale the cash system. Building a banking system on top of the cash system doesn't scale the cash system. That's analogous to scaling the subway system by building roads. I think I speak for most of the regulars in this sub when I say that if you'd asked me to invest money in a settlement token for a new banking system based on cryptography, I'd have shrugged. Re-creating the existing system on top of cryptography is neither interesting nor disruptive. What is disruptive is disintermediating banking altogether, by giving people the ability to make small, casual cashlike transactions with no need for a financial intermediary. TLDR: Only by scaling the underlying cash system do you scale the unique properties that make Bitcoin valuable in the first place. [link] [comments] | ||
UTXO commitments in BCH clients Posted: 11 Oct 2021 12:53 PM PDT Are UTXO commitments a thing in BCH clients? From what i understand(and correct me if im wrong) they basically enable you to only store relevant UTXOs and verify blocks without needing the whole chain. [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 11 Oct 2021 10:11 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 11 Oct 2021 03:08 PM PDT
| ||
ELI5 of the last BCH Network Discussion on Oct 6th is available! Posted: 11 Oct 2021 02:52 AM PDT
| ||
BTC fanboys refusing to listen to critics Posted: 12 Oct 2021 01:40 AM PDT If you look at the comment section of this post, BTC fanboys just talk about irrelevant things like the thumbnail of the video or how YouTube videos are untrustworthy in general about crypto. They didn't even watch the video. They are like little kids blocking their ears and say "llalalalala I can't hear youuuu you are an idiot haha look at your funny face". I was thinking about reinvesting in BTC but I realize now that it's mostly propaganda and hype without any real world practicality or meaning. It's just about fanboys trying to make money by luring more investors in with their every positive propaganda. [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 11 Oct 2021 09:44 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 11 Oct 2021 06:18 AM PDT
| ||
Why do you think BCH can succeed against alternatives like XLM or NANO? Posted: 11 Oct 2021 08:56 AM PDT I am very interested in speedy coins with cheap tx fees like BCH, NANO and XLM. Personally I like BCH the most out of all of these, because it seems to have the most adoption. I've been thinking about buying some recently. I want to hear from you, why do you think BCH is the best option? [link] [comments] | ||
We need your support. Bitcoin Cash Animal Rescue. Posted: 11 Oct 2021 05:42 PM PDT
|
You are subscribed to email updates from Bitcoin - A Peer to Peer Electronic Cash System. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment