• Breaking News

    Sunday, November 15, 2020

    BTC keys4coins.com will continue to accept Bitcoin Cash - BCH, the "BCHN" chain. Any accidental payment from the "BCHA" chain will be returned to you if it's safe to do so. If you give us permission to keep it as a donation, we will convert to BCH if it's safe to do so.

    BTC keys4coins.com will continue to accept Bitcoin Cash - BCH, the "BCHN" chain. Any accidental payment from the "BCHA" chain will be returned to you if it's safe to do so. If you give us permission to keep it as a donation, we will convert to BCH if it's safe to do so.


    keys4coins.com will continue to accept Bitcoin Cash - BCH, the "BCHN" chain. Any accidental payment from the "BCHA" chain will be returned to you if it's safe to do so. If you give us permission to keep it as a donation, we will convert to BCH if it's safe to do so.

    Posted: 15 Nov 2020 02:12 AM PST

    We'll be tracking today's Bitcoin Cash network upgrade as it unfolds on our homepage

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 08:31 PM PST

    ChainTip just upgraded to BCH Unlimited 1.9.0.1

    Posted: 15 Nov 2020 02:43 AM PST

    Thank you devs!

    submitted by /u/Tibanne
    [link] [comments]

    This is why Bitcoin Cash:

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 02:04 PM PST

    Bitcoin.com wallet should allow changing derivation paths for BCH

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 10:50 PM PST

    Bitcoin.com BCH wallets are using m/44'/0'/0' for their derivation path, and it creates a disaster when you import it to other wallets that don't allow people to change it from m/245'/0'/0' and m/145'/0'/0'.

    submitted by /u/RowanSkie
    [link] [comments]

    Bitcoin Cash primary website on CoinMarketCap changed to bch.info

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 03:11 PM PST

    Reminder: With the Hardfork the Difficulty Adjustment Algorithm for BCH will change to ASERT (aserti3-2d) which will solve the wild blocktime fluctuations on Bitcoin Cash

    Posted: 15 Nov 2020 12:13 AM PST

    "New episode of The Agora!: The Bitcoin Cash Fork w/CollinEnstad "

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 11:41 PM PST

    The developers of Bitcoin.com's mobile wallets want to support 10 million people and they disregarding important BCH features while that happens, should this be allowed?

    Posted: 15 Nov 2020 03:04 AM PST

    So, I have talked out in a Reddit post about letting the wallet have custom derivation paths and it is difficult to understand for new users, as explained by u/maplesyrupsucker in his comment on my post. However, if they really want to support 10 million users and make more people know about Cryptocurrency with support for BCH and BTC, why are they not immediately fixing features that are essential to BCH?

    The following are the features that a mobile wallet must have, especially for a wallet that serves BTC and BCH sorted in (subjectively) importance:

    1. Automatically changing addresses, especially when the address has been used. This is a privacy measure and one of Satoshi Nakamoto's answer for privacy.
    2. Proper recognition of verified SLP tokens. There are a lot of SLP tokens being created and verified, and Bitcoin.com doesn't follow the git repository that details which tokens are verified and not. Mistcoin and MAZE are verified, while they aren't in the Bitcoin.com wallet.
    3. Advanced features: Changeable wallet derivation paths. As explained in my previous post.
    4. CashFusion, CashShuffle, and Flipstarter support. Because it's hard to implement it directly, the closest function you guys can give is to recognize the transactions about it. Any Bitcoin.com wallet user that has ported to Electron Cash and used CashFusion shows up as a large send of BCH that that person never has, and then more often it doesn't recognize half of the addresses used without scanning the blockchain, an advanced function that users shouldn't use most of the time. You guys have managed to implement SLP tokens, after all.
    5. Open-source. I know the wallet uses third-party sources for its other parts of the wallet such as the Market Analysis section of BCH/BTC (handled by intotheblock), Sideshift.ai implementation, built-in Unstoppable Domains service for domain names, and other backend implementation, but you guys should have a repository that at least shows that you bear no ill will and with the community disagreement of the IFP and the general distrust in closed-source applications, you guys will only become a BTC wallet at this rate.

    I'm tempted to make a Flipstarter of 100 BCH for funding to push Bitcoin.com wallet to open source then create Lazyfox.io tasks worth 1000 mBCH/1 BCH to force Bitcoin.com wallet's source code to be leaked, and it is really just this close for me to do so.

    submitted by /u/RowanSkie
    [link] [comments]

    When this post is 8 hours old I'll be LIVE covering the events of fork day!

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 07:52 PM PST

    Could we place the download links (Mac, Linux, and Windows) for desktop wallets above the fold? I know a lot of people who struggle to find this.

    Posted: 15 Nov 2020 03:10 AM PST

    Can IPFS pinning be monetized in a decentralized way using only oracles and smart contracts?

    Posted: 15 Nov 2020 03:11 AM PST

    Basic functionality:

    1. First of all, the pinner and the user (demander of the service) make a smart contract in which the pinner only gets the money if he fulfills some conditions: time period, availability...
    2. In the contract, there's a list of several oracles chosen by both the pinner and the user.
    3. The job of these oracles is to check periodically that the file is available through IPFS.
    4. If a determined percentage of the oracles report that the file is missing for some time, the conditions of the contract decide who gets the money (either the user or the pinner).

    The problem is, how can oracles verify that the pinner has the complete file without needing to send the whole file to each oracle? As I see it, each oracle should have already a copy of the file for this to work, thus it would make sense that the oracle be also a pinner, and vice versa.

    The verification step:

    1. Checking that the file is IPFS accessible: If each oracle has the file, then they only need to ask the pinner for a few random bytes of data through IPFS. The smart contract determines how much delay there can be in receiving those bytes. However, this only proves that those bytes of the file are reachable through IPFS, but not that the pinner has the whole file. Also, the minimum size IPFS allows sending is 250kB blocks. Wouldn't that be too much overhead?
    2. In order to prove that the pinner has the entire file, let's suppose that there exists an algorithm that provides something like this:

      a. There's a random nonce generator which generates a new nonce at random intervals (the generator could maybe be an oracle).

      b. The nonce is sent to the pinner and the smart contract, with a timestamp.

      c. The pinner hashes the file with the nonce and his signature (using some special hash function), and sends the new hash to the smart contract.

      d. If there's too much delay in sending the new hash, the contract is broken.

      e. If the delay is within the limit, then the smart contract uses the algorithm which:

    • Can prove that the new hash could only be produced with the entire file; it wouldn't work if the pinner only had the hash of the original file.
    • Having only these four elements (original hash, new hash, signature of the pinner, and nonce) it can be proven that the whole file has been hashed with the nonce and the signature.
    • Does such an algorithm exist?
    submitted by /u/deojfj
    [link] [comments]

    Just picked up Death Stranding from @keys4coins.com, paid in #Bitcoin #Cash! ��❤️��

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 08:50 PM PST

    BCH community should make a shift of focus into creating higher utility for end users and investors

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 06:57 AM PST

    May one of you explain me why Bitcoin is valuable ?

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 11:08 PM PST

    I tried to understand how it got any value, but can't get around it. I've seen some post saying it's funding black market but how ? Why would it work as a currency as it's not a currency ?

    I don't get what makes it a currency. I don't get why you can sell them back for dollars.

    submitted by /u/Zyumeka
    [link] [comments]

    I love my candy machine from www.iozeta.com

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 08:46 AM PST

    Let’s go!

    Posted: 15 Nov 2020 03:52 AM PST

    Either way this goes, BCH FTW!

    submitted by /u/TulipTradingSatoshi
    [link] [comments]

    Bitcoin Cash Network Upgrade in Less Than 24 Hours! Watch the Countdown At Cash.coin.dance

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 04:13 AM PST

    Viability of a BCH OnlyFans

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 02:04 PM PST

    For those who don't know what OnlyFans is: it's a service where you can create a personal/business page and post content to (videos/images). Your fans can then view this content by subscribing to your page for a monthly fee or one of purchases. OnlyFans pays out 80% to the content creators.

    I have been thinking about developing this ever since Roger mentioned it a while ago. BCH would be a great fit with its low fees and 0-conf txs. Purchasing content could all be done instantly and on-chain. Content creators can withdraw as soon as all funds have been confirmed (OnlyFans only does payouts every 30 days) However, I am still not sure if developing a site like that is worth the (massive) effort. This isn't something you throw together in a couple of weeks (if you want it to scale that is) and chances are we aren't there yet, adoption wise, to introduce something like this successfully.

    Would like to hear your thoughts on the chances of a BCH OnlyFans gaining enough traction to justify the time spent developing it.

    submitted by /u/thegoodsamaritan777
    [link] [comments]

    Bitcoin Cash increase 1500%

    Posted: 15 Nov 2020 02:50 AM PST

    Bitcoin.com Reveals Limited Edition Bitcoin Cash Wristwatch Crafted by Luxury Watchmaker Franck Muller

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 11:58 AM PST

    Help me dump my BSV please

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 11:21 AM PST

    Is https://electrumsv.io legit? I'm trying to figure out how to dump my BSV after sweeping a paper wallet. When I download the client from that site, my Mac won't let me open it because it cannot verify the developer and guarantee it is free of malware. Is this the main client?

    submitted by /u/liquorstorevip
    [link] [comments]

    Meet the new narrative

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 07:56 AM PST

    This isn't a BCH community. This is a Bitcoin (BTC) community that allows uncensored discussion of a whole slew of Bitcoin and crypto topics, including but not exclusive to the BCH fork of Bitcoin.

    link to comment

    I've been observing quite a lot of accounts spreading this idea in one form or another as of recently. I believe the core army is unhappy that lots of new folks lend on this sub organically due the btc bull run, and thus will have the option to engage in uncensored discussions about Bitcoin's story.

    Alongside recent events such as BitcoinXio's account suspension, greg's direct attack on ShadowOfHarbringer etc this just smells very, very bad.

    submitted by /u/shengchalover
    [link] [comments]

    Waiting for ABC blocks post-fork

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 11:27 AM PST

    Bitcoin Cash ��������[Music]

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 11:09 PM PST

    Spend BCH anywhere idea.

    Posted: 14 Nov 2020 08:45 AM PST

    Interacting with legacy banking network is the biggest bottle neck for most crypto services. The ideal scenario from a users perspective is to spend your crypto in any shop or online with zero friction.

    How about this? A decentralised network of credit card holders linked by an app to crypto users. The user has a balance of bch on the app. For every purchase he makes, the app pays with one of the registered credit card holders details. The equivalent amount in BCH is then transferred to the credit card holders account.

    I am not sure of the technicalities but I am thinking you type in the bill amount to the app and it generates a one time payment authorisation using a selected card.

    The card holder gets a small fee for each order and he could geolocate purchases to his state or country along with a monthly spend limit.

    Feel free to shoot this idea down.

    submitted by /u/stewbits22
    [link] [comments]

    No comments:

    Post a Comment