BTC DO NOT USE bitcoinpaperwallet[.]com - exploit found similar to walletgenerator[.]net. Disappointingly, bitcoin.com links to both. |
- DO NOT USE bitcoinpaperwallet[.]com - exploit found similar to walletgenerator[.]net. Disappointingly, bitcoin.com links to both.
- The BCHinno is back!
- "The entire continent of Australia had only 3 retail BTC transactions in the month of April. BTC is the sick man of crypto."
- Lost in the Desert: Storm vs Avalanche, Theory vs Reality, Non-Starter vs Production Ready
- The narrative that we need to "stop funding infrastructure and focus on adoption" is stupid.
- “ Has anyone else noticed that many Bitcoiners have removed the ⚡️ emoji from their Twitter name? No one talks about this.”
- Honest question: How many of you anti-BCH people actually USE BTC on a regular basis? If you use it, pls give specific examples.
- Brian Roemmele:"Bitcoin Cash NFC transaction device. It is fast."
- Three years ago today Xapo stopped paying Bitcoin miner transaction fees for users because it was getting too expensive for them!
- Reminder:The main characteristic that made bitcoin (btc) blows up in the first place is being used as permissionless payment system. This is what created global demand for it...to USE it as global P2P cash to pay for stuff & services. Bitcoin has always meant to be a medium of exchange.
- This Just in:
- SLP tokens are now available via crypto ATM machines.
- Irish freedom party phd immunologist Dolores Cahil high credintials holding propoganda and political leaders to account. Reaching out to tell them about bch. Go on the Irish
- PSA to /u/Egon_1 and other posters who regularly shit post against Bitcoin BTC: it's fine; however, please also highlight a positive toward BCH in your titles. Calling out another coin on its weeknesses is fine, however, on /r/btc we should focus on BCH strenghts and provide improvement suggestions
- BU nodes exceed ABC nodes, and Bitcoin Cash Nodes growing rapidly
- Avalanche excellently explained by Emin Gün Sirer
- Buying lunch with Bitcoin Cash!
- Bitcoin vs Bitcoin Cash Transaction Fees (High Transaction Throughputs)
- Looks like Adam wasn't very happy...
- Banks and credit card companies increasingly confirming why we need Bitcoin. This happened today when I tried to by BCH in Bitcoin.com wallet.
- Who are those people on the right side? I know many people who are using the left side but none on the right side. Who is ready to pay big money to wait in line? Someone is controlling something.
- Have there been discussions to make the IFP palatable?
- Comparison of different stores of value
- Seems like I ran into r/Bitcoin censorship.
- Elon Musk Says Bitcoin Looks 'Solid' Compared To 'Currency Issuance By Govt Central Banks'...
Posted: 16 May 2020 06:42 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 16 May 2020 06:30 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 16 May 2020 06:23 PM PDT
| ||
Lost in the Desert: Storm vs Avalanche, Theory vs Reality, Non-Starter vs Production Ready Posted: 17 May 2020 01:38 AM PDT
| ||
The narrative that we need to "stop funding infrastructure and focus on adoption" is stupid. Posted: 16 May 2020 08:48 PM PDT Bitcoin Cash is a diverse ecosystem where community contributors can focus on many different sub-communities:
We can (and we ARE) pursuing adoption strategies and pushing infrastructure features/enhancements. These sub-communities all exist simultaneously without subtracting from the others. In fact, they enhance each other because of the cross-pollination of ideas and funding. [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 16 May 2020 06:50 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 16 May 2020 12:07 PM PDT I'm trying to have an open mind. But right now I can't see any use case for BTC that isn't a thousand times cheaper and faster on a hundred other networks. Please answer honestly and in good faith, I'd like to know how I am wrong. I used to own a lot of BTC but it was slow and expensive and really just sucked in user experience. To me it is a total dead end by now, nothing more than a risky ponzi scheme betting that number go up. Please don't tell me about the hash rate, that is just circular reasoning and not a use case. I can think of many much safer "store of values", I'm not interested in that. I'm interested in technology that will change my life and the world, changing the flow of money as much as the Internet changed the flow of information. [link] [comments] | ||
Brian Roemmele:"Bitcoin Cash NFC transaction device. It is fast." Posted: 16 May 2020 12:54 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 16 May 2020 04:23 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 16 May 2020 07:47 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 16 May 2020 05:01 PM PDT
| ||
SLP tokens are now available via crypto ATM machines. Posted: 16 May 2020 04:39 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 17 May 2020 12:10 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 16 May 2020 08:26 AM PDT Stop being the crazy girlfriend https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yh0AhrY9GjA Special greetings to /u/aviathor, our resident troll who will inevitably troll this thread. Another proof /r/btc is not censored. [link] [comments] | ||
BU nodes exceed ABC nodes, and Bitcoin Cash Nodes growing rapidly Posted: 16 May 2020 02:47 PM PDT In what can only be interpreted as a response to ABC's failed IFP mining tax, BU nodes now exceed ABC nodes. And BCH Node is the choice of fully 6% of node operators. Yet ABC still stubbornly refuses to revert the IFP code! EDIT: Well guys, it seems I triggered a few negative responses. I was a HUGE ABC supporter last year, but they lost my vote when they started pushing IFP. And the more the ABC team pushed IFP, and the shadier their tactics to distract people from it became, the more I lost faith in their integrity. The fact that opinion leaders like Vin and Hayden support IFP makes me truly sad - IMHO it's a horrible idea, and it needs to die in a fire. Not only is IFP unethical, it's an attack on the fundamental consensus and Nash equilibrium of Bitcoin. Both Vin and Hayden are heroes of mine, so I can only conclude that they've been fed some powerful Koolaid. That said, I'm 100% behind the BCH P2P electronic currency project, and 100% believe that BCH Node will be the path forward with the best devs on an ethically sound roadmap. I'm not a huge BU fan, but I think it's obvious why people now choose BU over ABC - BU is ardently opposed to IFP and BCH Node is a brand new fork. Finally, the way Amaury and team are talking is really alarming, I just can't stomach all of this BS about "protest movements". In my opinion BCH Node is the path forward: no shitty IFP and no garbage propaganda to justify it. Sorry guys but it's just the way it is in my opinion. [link] [comments] | ||
Avalanche excellently explained by Emin Gün Sirer Posted: 17 May 2020 02:20 AM PDT
| ||
Buying lunch with Bitcoin Cash! Posted: 16 May 2020 01:16 PM PDT
| ||
Bitcoin vs Bitcoin Cash Transaction Fees (High Transaction Throughputs) Posted: 16 May 2020 10:56 PM PDT
| ||
Looks like Adam wasn't very happy... Posted: 16 May 2020 03:24 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 16 May 2020 02:31 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 16 May 2020 07:46 PM PDT
| ||
Have there been discussions to make the IFP palatable? Posted: 16 May 2020 07:16 PM PDT I initially thought it was a great idea, I actually was one of the first ones to cheer on it. Then, I read the execution details and quickly disenchanted. The second round wasn't much better. That being said, I am still under the impression there could be a way to make this work. How about combining the Flipstarter and the IFP? For example, there could be a quaterly vote where users actually vote with their money on projects (time horizon of those project could be longer). There could be versions of the projects (time and budget). Then, at the end of the quarter, the IFP tops up the top 5 projects. I know, I know, I KNOW, this is a crude idea. Main criticism is how to make sure the IFP funds do not get Theymos'ed. Would there be a way to have the funds directly transfered to a smart contract? And why aren't the miners directly funding the devs? There could be a healthy funding competition between miners and the users! [link] [comments] | ||
Comparison of different stores of value Posted: 16 May 2020 05:27 AM PDT
| ||
Seems like I ran into r/Bitcoin censorship. Posted: 16 May 2020 05:22 PM PDT So, I've been talking in the Bitcoin subreddit recently. Just giving my opinion and looking into their arguments. For example, I made a post talking about the block size limit and how it doesn't really make sense to keep it as low as it is. I tried not to break any rules in my posts or comments. I got several responses. Some good, some not. https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/gkdr0q/how_does_it_make_sense_to_keep_the_block_size/ I was actually a little surprised to see that my post wasn't removed. I guess I figured maybe they were just really strict with their rules and the censorship wasn't so bad as long as you were careful with your wording. However, I came back to my post recently and it's been removed. That sure doesn't help their case for me. I guess it's good though. At least now I can say I've experienced the censorship first hand. [link] [comments] | ||
Elon Musk Says Bitcoin Looks 'Solid' Compared To 'Currency Issuance By Govt Central Banks'... Posted: 16 May 2020 04:28 AM PDT |
You are subscribed to email updates from Bitcoin - The Internet of Money. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment