BTC Risk For Bitcoin Cash = Up |
- Risk For Bitcoin Cash = Up
- Croatian post office offering crypto to cash
- To maintain BCH community unity we need to ackgnowledge good intentions of our opponents.
- (Request for Chinese fluent redditors) How is the new proposal going over in the Chinese community?
- Which is Better? Miners donating directly to projects? Or funds going into one big pool which is then given out on a per project basis?
- Fellowship Of Dev Fund
- Funding proposal seems like sound game theory. But to avoid a split in community, the implementation needs to be discussed.
- Who here knows what tragedy of the commons means?
- Removing centralisation from the dev funding proposal
- Privacy issue bitcoin.com wallet
- Toxic Bitcoiners drove Kim Dotcom to Bitcoin Cash - Decrypt
- Friendly Reminder: Always Backup Your Wallet
- How do I convert BSV from the fork to BCHABC?
- Crypto Meatspace: In-Real-Life Meetups Around the World From Brazil, Japan, Miami, to Los Angeles
- This Week In Bitcoin Cash, January 19th - 25th
- Data Shows $25 Billion Worth of Bitcoin and Ether Held by Seven Crypto Exchanges
- Alvin Yyers forms a cartel to protect Bitcoin Cash
- BUIP to allow ++voluntary++ miner payouts from blocks to additional addresses
- "My intuition is that not only will this cartel initiative go as planned, but that it will result in solid price gains for BCH and go down as one of the most important innovations in Bitcoin. Voluntary, time-constrained, free market solution to one of Bitcoin's greatest problems."
- My View on the Miner Infrastructure Funding Plan
- Summary of Improvements Suggested For BCH Funding
- How to sell BTC for BCH on Gemini???
- Hard fork it
- "For all the interpersonal fighting within the Bitcoin Cash "community", at least I believe that every developer involved wants the best for the future of everyone -- not just themselves."
Posted: 26 Jan 2020 01:25 AM PST | ||
Croatian post office offering crypto to cash Posted: 25 Jan 2020 02:23 PM PST
| ||
To maintain BCH community unity we need to ackgnowledge good intentions of our opponents. Posted: 25 Jan 2020 10:57 AM PST
| ||
(Request for Chinese fluent redditors) How is the new proposal going over in the Chinese community? Posted: 25 Jan 2020 04:41 PM PST I am curious if the Chinese community has the same mixed emotions as r/btc in regards to the new proposal, any info from Chinese fluent redditors would be much appreciated, Thanks! [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 25 Jan 2020 08:36 PM PST | ||
Posted: 25 Jan 2020 11:47 AM PST
| ||
Posted: 26 Jan 2020 12:41 AM PST I've always held that the community is BCH's greatest strength. No other crypto comes close. We need to keep it that way. No censorship, lots of healthy arguing and discussion. Lots of us will have to compromise on our principles. Remember: perfect is the enemy of good. [link] [comments] | ||
Who here knows what tragedy of the commons means? Posted: 25 Jan 2020 09:21 PM PST Cause I do and its nothing at all related to what that miner thinks it is. I haven't posted much at all since that cluster fuck of the bsv chain split but now got some messages about the proposed miner tax. Curious how Roger ver is able to reconcile this idea with his public statements for years now about voluntaryism and freedom. They are not compatible. And if he thinks that this a special case that demands expediency rather than principles then he has lost the plot. [link] [comments] | ||
Removing centralisation from the dev funding proposal Posted: 25 Jan 2020 02:32 PM PST
This removes any notion of a centralised party which decides where funds go. The miners who mine the blocks get to decide where the funds go and they can't choose to burn the 12.5% if there are 1 or more addresses that appear in at least 5 of the last 10 funding lists. The majority of miners get to determine the worthy potentials but can't pay the 12.5% to their own addresses as they won't appear in at least 5 out of 10 blocks. All donations from miners to devs are transparent Looking for people to poke holes in this! Thanks! [link] [comments] | ||
Privacy issue bitcoin.com wallet Posted: 25 Jan 2020 09:29 PM PST You may have heard Roger talking about coin shuffle coming to their iPhone wallet which may sound nice for privacy, However, it seems the latest iPhone version of the wallet reuses change addresses. In my case addresses I used more than a year ago. Now your current spendings are linked to previous spendings even if you often empty your wallet completely and put new coins in it. I consider this a major privacy issue. Perhaps someone can tag one of their developers, can't find the GitHub for this version of the wallet. I don't exclude I did something dumb, so if anyone using this wallet can confirm? [link] [comments] | ||
Toxic Bitcoiners drove Kim Dotcom to Bitcoin Cash - Decrypt Posted: 25 Jan 2020 03:40 PM PST
| ||
Friendly Reminder: Always Backup Your Wallet Posted: 25 Jan 2020 10:11 AM PST I had a bit of a scare earlier today when a file was corrupted and I 'lost' some BCH. Luckily, I had it backed up and was able to restore the funds. The moral of the story is - ALWAYS write down your passphrases/private keys and keep them in a safe place and make sure they are up to date! That is all. :) [link] [comments] | ||
How do I convert BSV from the fork to BCHABC? Posted: 25 Jan 2020 11:02 PM PST So I have a paper wallet that I haven't touched since like 3 years ago and I'm not updated with BCH news since then. I checked today and found out I have 2 coins from the paper wallet, one BCH and one BSV ddue to fork. Basically I want to convert my BSV to BCH, how do I do this? I went to https://coinswap.keys4coins.com/ but I need to have a non-paper wallet address for my BSV, after downloading like 3 apps only ElectrumSV can import paper wallet. I clicked the send button and paste the coinswap link in the "Pay to" section then put max in in the "Amount" I want to send but after Preview I can't sign the transaction.... Is there an easier way of doing this, I've been googling this for an hour now, creating accounts on different websites only to find out they don't support BSV. [link] [comments] | ||
Crypto Meatspace: In-Real-Life Meetups Around the World From Brazil, Japan, Miami, to Los Angeles Posted: 25 Jan 2020 02:50 PM PST
| ||
This Week In Bitcoin Cash, January 19th - 25th Posted: 25 Jan 2020 10:10 AM PST
| ||
Data Shows $25 Billion Worth of Bitcoin and Ether Held by Seven Crypto Exchanges Posted: 25 Jan 2020 06:31 PM PST
| ||
Alvin Yyers forms a cartel to protect Bitcoin Cash Posted: 25 Jan 2020 04:16 PM PST | ||
BUIP to allow ++voluntary++ miner payouts from blocks to additional addresses Posted: 25 Jan 2020 02:21 PM PST DISCLAIMER, right up front. This is an improvement proposal which I suggested personally, and it has not yet been accepted by the BU membership, who first need to vote on BUIPs before they get accepted or rejected. So please do not mistake this for an official BU communication or anything endorsed by BU. I am just a member, every member is free to propose BUIPs (or even sponsor non-members who want to propose BUIPs). Rough summary: This BUIP proposes a feature to let a miner easily pay out some percentages of a block reward to additional addresses, which they can freely configure. The default would be to pay out a small percentage (e.g. 3%) to a donation address set as default by the maintainer of the software (in this case as BU is maintaining the BUcash client, they would receive this contribution). Benefits:
Q: How is this better than miners just sending funds to their favorite projects via normal transactions? A: For one, it is easier to track because it happens directly as outputs from the coinbase, and not some random transactions which someone would need to identify. If miners want more privacy, they can still choose to donate through those. Secondly, it's automated - once the node is configured, the miner doesn't have to worry about doing manual transactions. Thirdly, because it's based on percentages of the block reward, it automatically follows reward reductions (halvings) in proportion, unlike manually set up payments which need to have their amounts adjusted manually too (ok, someone could also program to reduce those automatically). Fourth, why should a miner/pool need to donate 12,5% of their coinbase to spend on e.g. 4 dev teams when they might want to support only the dev team of their choice, which might only get 3% (~ 1/4) of the 12,5% anyway. This proposal might save them the 9% spent on developers they do not want to support. There is a fairness principle here - pay for the service that you use or you want to use. Not pay for services you do not use or want. I think this has been neglected in the conversation so far. [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 25 Jan 2020 09:09 AM PST
| ||
My View on the Miner Infrastructure Funding Plan Posted: 25 Jan 2020 08:33 AM PST | ||
Summary of Improvements Suggested For BCH Funding Posted: 25 Jan 2020 07:15 AM PST | ||
How to sell BTC for BCH on Gemini??? Posted: 25 Jan 2020 07:48 PM PST Seems simple enough but I can't see any way to do that! WTF! Am I crazy or are these Buy/Sell options the same thing. It only lets you go one way?? [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 25 Jan 2020 07:02 AM PST
| ||
Posted: 25 Jan 2020 09:11 AM PST |
You are subscribed to email updates from Bitcoin - The Internet of Money. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment