BTC This is why more and more businesses are making the switch from BTC to BCH |
- This is why more and more businesses are making the switch from BTC to BCH
- The guy who won this week's MillionaireMakers drawing has received ~$55 in BCH and ~$30 in BTC. It will cost him less than $0.01 to move the BCH, but $6.16 (20%) in fees to move the BTC.
- The Cash Accounts specification has been updated to support tokens!
- People who say BTC is a store of value have no idea how Bitcoin first took off - because of Silk Road. Nobody in his right mind would have gambled on a coin which almost literally came out of thin air and wasn't used for anything, but actually having a use case made it a real currency.
- @Bitcoin Twitter account under the threat of being banned by BTC supporters
- The Inbound Capacity Problem in the Lightning Network
- "After seeing the private messages between @jack and @zackvoell looking to deplatform @bitcoin it begs the question how much we can believe @MessariCrypto to be transparent and non biased in it’s reporting"
- I've started including a BCH address in the videos on my music theory channel. While there might not be a lot of overlap in the communities, it should at least be some positive exposure for BCH =)
- The average South Korean crypto trader took advantage of the bear market - average increased holdings by +65% over past year!
- US bitcoin trader and girlfriend could face death penalty over Thai 'seastead' | CNN
- Observation: Many Bitcoin Core (BTC) proponents are very comfortable with three dishonest means
- Graphene compression with / without CTOR
- BTC maximalists continue their attacks on the @Bitcoin Twitter account trying to get it suspended or taken over -- let me be very clear -- Bitcoin is NOT a brand name! It is not equivalent to Adidas, Nike, or Rolex.
- Peter R. Rizun: "BTC is realizing that Lightning cannot solve the high-fee problem and that a block-size limit increase is needed for another growth cycle. But once bigger blocks are discussed seriously, BCH will gain further credibility as its scaling roadmap is recognized as superior."
- introducing STAT for CashShuffle -- a solution to the consolidation problem.
- Japan To Have Another Exchange
- Best way to split BCHSV and BCH today?
- “Hey @Jack, asking @Bitcoin to give up their account, which discusses the IDEA of Bitcoin rather than a single implementation, is like asking @God to give up theirs because they tweet about both Catholicism and Judaism. Sorry you invested in @lightning, but Bitcoin needs it not.”
- Crypto Charity Airdrop Venezuela Raises $292K – Mostly in BCH
- ASICseer.com is an ASIC management and monitoring system that installs directly onto Bitmain hardware. We launched today, come check us out!
- Flowee version 2019.04 is created, it has a small number of bugfixes but most importantly it supports the May 15th #BitcoinCash protocol upgrade. Hub users can just sync to the "latest" docker tag or compile from the 2019.04 branch.
- Yahoo Finance: "[BTC] and [BCH] both have different ideas on how to make Bitcoin usable for increased traffic.... Time will tell who is right"
- South Korean investors are spending 6,000 USD on average for Crypto. What about you?
- SegWit is a Fork. Bitcoin Core (BTC) is a Fork! Facts are Facts!
- Belarus Could Get a Nuclear-Powered Bitcoin Mining Center
This is why more and more businesses are making the switch from BTC to BCH Posted: 22 Apr 2019 10:29 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 22 Apr 2019 04:04 PM PDT Post: https://np.reddit.com/r/millionairemakers/comments/bg1c7o/its_an_easter_miracle/ I arrived at this figure by looking at the number of inputs in his BTC address (13 at the time of this post), and using the current recommended fee for next-block confirmation on BTC, which is 58 satoshis per byte according to https://bitcoinfees.info/ This is also ignoring the fees that were required to send him the BTC in the first place. I see several transactions that had to pay $0.50 or more in fees just to send the guy $1. Those people are effectively only giving the guy $0.50 instead of the dollar they think they are sending, because he now has to pay the fee to move it himself. This is why BCH still works as p2p ecash and BTC doesn't. [link] [comments] | ||
The Cash Accounts specification has been updated to support tokens! Posted: 22 Apr 2019 04:37 PM PDT | ||
Posted: 22 Apr 2019 08:50 AM PDT One study estimated most of the of coins mined at the time (circa 2013) went through SR , so most of its use case was a currency - the complete opposite of what Core pushes it to be now. [link] [comments] | ||
@Bitcoin Twitter account under the threat of being banned by BTC supporters Posted: 23 Apr 2019 12:44 AM PDT
| ||
The Inbound Capacity Problem in the Lightning Network Posted: 22 Apr 2019 03:38 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 22 Apr 2019 12:11 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 22 Apr 2019 05:42 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 23 Apr 2019 01:58 AM PDT
| ||
US bitcoin trader and girlfriend could face death penalty over Thai 'seastead' | CNN Posted: 22 Apr 2019 07:33 PM PDT
| ||
Observation: Many Bitcoin Core (BTC) proponents are very comfortable with three dishonest means Posted: 22 Apr 2019 12:42 PM PDT
Conclusion: morally corrupt and their opinion leaders remain silent or are complicit. [link] [comments] | ||
Graphene compression with / without CTOR Posted: 22 Apr 2019 08:56 AM PDT In my post last week, /u/mallocdotc asked how Graphene compression rates compare with and without order information being included in the block. Just to be clear, this is mostly an academic discussion in BCH today because, as of BU release 1.6.0, Graphene will leverage CTOR by default and no longer need to send order information. Nevertheless, it's an interesting question, so I went ahead and ran a separate experiment on mainnet. What's at stake are log(n) bits per transaction (plus serialization overhead) needed to convey order information. Since calculating order information size is straightforward given the number of transactions in the block, this experiment is really just about looking at the typical distribution of block transaction counts and translating that to compression rates. Beginning with block 000000000000000002b18e2235e5ae3f62abb4be1bd6e933bafd47899c2ab721, I ran two different BU nodes on mainnet. Each was compiled with commit 02aa05be on the BU dev branch. For one version, which I'll call no_ctor, I altered the code to send order information even though it wasn't necessary. The other node, with_ctor, ran unmodified code so that no order information was sent. Below are the compression results. Overall, there were 533 blocks, 13 of which had more than 1K transactions. Just a reminder, compression rate is calculated as 1 - g/f, where g and f are the size in bytes of the Graphene and full blocks, respectively. with_ctor: best compression overall: 0.9988310929281122 mean compression (all blocks): 0.9622354472957148 median compression (all blocks): 0.9887816917208885 mean compression (blocks > 1K tx): 0.9964066061006223 median compression (blocks > 1K tx): 0.9976625137327318 no_ctor: best compression overall: 0.9960665539078787 mean compression (all blocks): 0.9595203105258268 median compression (all blocks): 0.9855845466339916 mean compression (blocks > 1K tx): 0.9915431691098592 median compression (blocks > 1K tx): 0.9929303640862496 The improvement in median compression over all blocks amounts to approximately a 21% reduction in block size using with_ctor over no_ctor. And for blocks with more than 1K transactions, there is approximately a 71% reduction in block size. So we can see that with_ctor achieves better compression overall than no_ctor. But the improvement in compression is really only significant for blocks with more than 1K transactions. This probably explains why the order information was reported to account for so much of the total Graphene block size during the BCH stress test, which produced larger blocks than we typically see today. Specifically, that report cites an average of 37.03KB used for order information. But in my experiment I saw only 321.37B (two orders of magnitude less). Edit: What's at stake are log(n) bits per transaction, not n log(n). [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 22 Apr 2019 10:33 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 22 Apr 2019 05:19 AM PDT
| ||
introducing STAT for CashShuffle -- a solution to the consolidation problem. Posted: 22 Apr 2019 09:52 AM PDT
| ||
Japan To Have Another Exchange Posted: 22 Apr 2019 08:29 PM PDT
| ||
Best way to split BCHSV and BCH today? Posted: 22 Apr 2019 09:03 PM PDT I have some old BCH that I never split. What's the best way to split it? I was about to use https://github.com/markblundeberg/coinsplitter but there's a note here that says:
So I'm having trouble following. I have those two wallets, I'm supposed to get some dust and then "use" the wallets... use them how? I can send some split BCH and/or BCHSV from an exchange to myself but then what do I do? Please help. Thanks. [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 22 Apr 2019 05:55 AM PDT
| ||
Crypto Charity Airdrop Venezuela Raises $292K – Mostly in BCH Posted: 22 Apr 2019 10:25 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 23 Apr 2019 12:15 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 22 Apr 2019 06:35 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 22 Apr 2019 05:35 AM PDT
| ||
South Korean investors are spending 6,000 USD on average for Crypto. What about you? Posted: 22 Apr 2019 09:04 PM PDT https://bitcoinnews.com/south-korea-crypto-investors-spent-6000-average-in-2018/ How much are you spending on crypto and which country are you from? [link] [comments] | ||
SegWit is a Fork. Bitcoin Core (BTC) is a Fork! Facts are Facts! Posted: 22 Apr 2019 08:08 AM PDT
| ||
Belarus Could Get a Nuclear-Powered Bitcoin Mining Center Posted: 22 Apr 2019 06:39 PM PDT |
You are subscribed to email updates from Bitcoin - The Internet of Money. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
Did you know? Zipmex Exchange is giving $15 free bitcoins to the Australian users just for signing up with exchange, as they are launching this week.
ReplyDeletezipmex exchange
zipmex trading
zipmex exchange review