Ethereum Don’t Believe the FUD, Ethereum Can Scale. We wrote an-op-Ed for Coindesk. |
- Don’t Believe the FUD, Ethereum Can Scale. We wrote an-op-Ed for Coindesk.
- Groundhog launches recurring subscription payments on Ethereum
- Latest Week in Ethereum News - new URL
- Eth 222.0 Livestream at Stanford
- Proof of Funds
- Current State of Token Curated Registries / Replay Aracon
- Conversation between Balaji and Eli Ben Sasson from Zcash and Starkware
- Ethereum-graph-debugger rewritten and now interactive!
- Question about shard partitions and inter-shard communication
- New to this
- Yeeth Gitcoin Grant
- FREE: Add a ETH to USD exchange rate calculator to your site
- How do you think the role of GDPR will play in blockchain adoption? And, will an increase in compliance with GDPR make it harder to comply with KYC requirements?
| Don’t Believe the FUD, Ethereum Can Scale. We wrote an-op-Ed for Coindesk. Posted: 02 Feb 2019 06:05 AM PST
 | ||
| Groundhog launches recurring subscription payments on Ethereum Posted: 02 Feb 2019 01:01 PM PST
 | ||
| Latest Week in Ethereum News - new URL Posted: 02 Feb 2019 10:07 AM PST | ||
| Eth 222.0 Livestream at Stanford Posted: 02 Feb 2019 11:14 AM PST
 | ||
| Posted: 02 Feb 2019 03:55 PM PST A friend of mine needs to prove to someone else that they control a certain amount of ether. Is there a standardized process for doing this? I know he can sign a message, but I'm wanting exact wording with clear instructions for both parties. I'm wanting to expand on this article: https://medium.com/yopiter/proving-ownership-of-a-cryptocurrency-86a96f2c52b Here is the what I'm thinking: Proving Party: 1) Move X ether to a new account. 2) Sign a message from that new account saying something to the effect of "I, $NAME, have access to the Ethereum account $ACCOUNT. As of $DATE, this account has X ether." 3) Send the message and signature to the verifying party Verifying Party: 1) Verify the signature with something like https://etherscan.io/verifySig. This proves they have access to the account. The actual message could be a lie though. 2) Check the balance of the address in the message to verify they actually have the funds. I think most everyone would be fine using etherscan, but if they want to run a node and do all the verifying with their own clients, that is possible to. I do want to find a clear way to say that the signature really only proves ownership of the keys and the message itself has to verified separately. I'm not sure if the message should have more things in it that aren't actually proven by the signature. Like having it say "I, $NAME, have sole access to the Ethereum account." Things like that can't actually be verified without trusting a third party and so maybe it shouldn't be included at all. In my case, the proving party is familiar with cryptocurrency, but this is the verifying party's first major interaction with it. I want to have a system that works for novices on both sides. Thoughts? Have I missed a standard? [link] [comments]  | ||
| Current State of Token Curated Registries / Replay Aracon Posted: 02 Feb 2019 12:00 PM PST
 | ||
| Conversation between Balaji and Eli Ben Sasson from Zcash and Starkware Posted: 02 Feb 2019 12:53 PM PST
 | ||
| Ethereum-graph-debugger rewritten and now interactive! Posted: 02 Feb 2019 12:47 PM PST
 | ||
| Question about shard partitions and inter-shard communication Posted: 02 Feb 2019 07:52 AM PST I try to stay in touch with sharding development but there is a question I couldn't find an answer to. It seems to me that the trade-off inherent to a sharded blockchain is that cross-shard communications must be slower than intra-shard communication since a node only knows the current states in the shard is validating (I read an estimate of 6 minutes for a cross shard transaction on ethresear.ch). If sharding is to become a true scaling solution and we imagine a future ethereum blockchain with 100+ shards, this means that on average more than 99% of all transactions will be slow cross shards transactions and finality in the sharded blockchain become much much slower than in a non-sharded one. This is of course if the account partition into the different shards is more or less random. So what do researcher imagine to circumvent this problem? Do they imagine a future where accounts will be in the same shard as the accounts they are most likely to interact with? If yes how would that works? Thanks for the answers [link] [comments]  | ||
| Posted: 02 Feb 2019 06:30 PM PST Can anyone explain to me how WBTC is and is it 21 million of these as well. Like how does this work. [link] [comments]  | ||
| Posted: 02 Feb 2019 09:05 AM PST
 | ||
| FREE: Add a ETH to USD exchange rate calculator to your site Posted: 02 Feb 2019 06:56 AM PST Hey guys, A friend and I have been working on a free embedable crypto calculator. It contains over 2,000 digital assets including ETH, bitcoin, ERC20s, Stellar assets etc. The exchange rate can be calculated into 5 different fiat currencies including USD, EUR, GBP, HKD, and JPY. You can add it to your website within a few minutes and I created some educational videos showing you how for your CMS: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFUz39K6LLxxRYGcDSaO3CA I think this could be a really helpful little tool for webmasters to improve user experience for free. Would really appreciate your feedback. Thanks, Chris - Coinponent [link] [comments]  | ||
| Posted: 01 Feb 2019 10:23 PM PST Read an article yesterday on ZCash and their thoughts on how privacy will be a key factor in adoption due to its compliance with GDPR requirements. But it got me thinking —- does that make it more difficult to comply KYC requirements? Could we use Zero Knowledge proofs as a means of complying with kyc requirements by verifying key pairs? (asking, not sure myself. Still learning) [link] [comments]  |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Ethereum. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment