Ethereum First time in Ethereum's history, miners made more from fees than from block rewards |
- First time in Ethereum's history, miners made more from fees than from block rewards
- eth2 quick update no. 18 - Danny Ryan
- Sent tokens to self address
- Rocket Pool 2.5 — Beta Guides
- Multi-client Ethereum networks
- Chainlink Brings Onchain Proof of Reserve to WBTC and secure $1B+ of Assets
- Ethereum scaling project SKALE now live with Phase 2 mainnet
- Fork Sushiswap | Full Tutorial
- Eth 2.0 Fuzzing Update #08 by Sigma Prime
- Re: Ethereum fees higher than block rewards: Observations About Paul Sztorc's Bitcoin "Security Budget in the Long Run" Essay
- Venezuela to Create Decentralized Stock Exchange on Ethereum - Decrypt
- CFTC Charges BitMEX Owners with Illegally Operating a Cryptocurrency Derivatives Trading Platform and Anti-Money Laundering Violations
- Ethereum DeFi Tutorial - Decentralised Finance Clearly Explained For Beginners
- [LIVE] Ethereum 2.0 call #49 [2020/10/1 - 14:00 GMT]
- Rug Pulls on Uniswap - how they work
- What hardware for an Ethereum 2.0 validator ?
- The Bull Case for Social Tokens
- 10x Staking - eRSDL = Merchant Banking DeFI
- A comprehensive analysis of DEX liquidity aggregators’ performance (TL;DR: Matcha delivers the best price >70% of the time vs. all DEX aggregators and Uniswap)
- WAX tokenomics - Includes Bridge & Staking on ETH
- Why do the Kucoin hackers think ERC-20 tokens are untraceable?
- Can't generate ABI for smart contracts if libraries included in program
First time in Ethereum's history, miners made more from fees than from block rewards Posted: 01 Oct 2020 06:35 AM PDT
| ||
eth2 quick update no. 18 - Danny Ryan Posted: 01 Oct 2020 08:38 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 01 Oct 2020 06:47 PM PDT Hello all I was trying to send Celsius tokens from one wallet to another, but i accidentally sent it to the same address I was sending it from. I've waited at least half an hour and something strange is happening it says that I have my tokens in the wallet, but then it says insufficient funds. I've used meta mask and MEW, any help would be much appreciated. here is the transaction ID: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x56cf9a85b76168742394ebed84f877046989eb05a1fc65ada87e6eda7eb7d917 [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 01 Oct 2020 05:54 PM PDT
| ||
Multi-client Ethereum networks Posted: 01 Oct 2020 08:26 AM PDT
| ||
Chainlink Brings Onchain Proof of Reserve to WBTC and secure $1B+ of Assets Posted: 01 Oct 2020 06:19 AM PDT
| ||
Ethereum scaling project SKALE now live with Phase 2 mainnet Posted: 01 Oct 2020 04:59 PM PDT
| ||
Fork Sushiswap | Full Tutorial Posted: 01 Oct 2020 12:42 PM PDT
| ||
Eth 2.0 Fuzzing Update #08 by Sigma Prime Posted: 01 Oct 2020 05:51 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 01 Oct 2020 11:46 AM PDT
| ||
Venezuela to Create Decentralized Stock Exchange on Ethereum - Decrypt Posted: 01 Oct 2020 03:14 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 01 Oct 2020 09:14 AM PDT
| ||
Ethereum DeFi Tutorial - Decentralised Finance Clearly Explained For Beginners Posted: 01 Oct 2020 07:36 AM PDT
| ||
[LIVE] Ethereum 2.0 call #49 [2020/10/1 - 14:00 GMT] Posted: 30 Sep 2020 11:38 PM PDT
| ||
Rug Pulls on Uniswap - how they work Posted: 01 Oct 2020 08:57 AM PDT
| ||
What hardware for an Ethereum 2.0 validator ? Posted: 01 Oct 2020 05:49 AM PDT
| ||
The Bull Case for Social Tokens Posted: 01 Oct 2020 02:33 PM PDT
| ||
10x Staking - eRSDL = Merchant Banking DeFI Posted: 01 Oct 2020 08:58 AM PDT | ||
Posted: 01 Oct 2020 12:19 PM PDT
| ||
WAX tokenomics - Includes Bridge & Staking on ETH Posted: 01 Oct 2020 11:51 AM PDT
| ||
Why do the Kucoin hackers think ERC-20 tokens are untraceable? Posted: 01 Oct 2020 01:36 AM PDT So $13M worth of ERC-20 hacked from Kucoin, have been "laundered" through Uniswap, Kyber and other DEXes. How exactly is that "laundering", when ERC-20 coins live on the Ethereum blockchain, and are perfectly traceable even with common tools like Etherscan.io, let alone blockchain analysis stuff like Chainalysis and Elliptic? [link] [comments] | ||
Can't generate ABI for smart contracts if libraries included in program Posted: 30 Sep 2020 11:36 PM PDT Hi there, I am using remix online http://remix.ethereum.org/ to compile smart contracts, but the ABI is not being produced if the contract has any libraries or other definitions above the contract code itself. Example simple code follows. If I leave the library definitions in, the ABI is blank (copy it just gives "[]"). I am working on more advanced contracts and need to be able to specify libraries, interfaces, and even other contracts before the main contract for which I want the ABI. Can I get the ABI for the bottom (main) contract somehow even if lots of libraries, interfaces, and even other contracts before the main contract? P.s. I am not able to use import functions for this application, but somehow if I could get the ABI just for the bottom contract (right now no ABI at all). pragma solidity 0.6.8; /*******************************************************/ / ONLY IF I CUT THIS LIBRARY OUT THE ABI IS PRODUCED **/ library Math { /* * @dev Returns the largest of two numbers. */ function max(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) { return a >= b ? a : b; } } /*******************************************************/ /*******************************************************/ contract TestContract { // Container of the greeting string private greeting; } [link] [comments] |
You are subscribed to email updates from Ethereum. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment