Bitcoin Cash Let's compete in Reddit's Scaling Bakeoff (with SLP tokens of course). Who's in?

Let's compete in Reddit's Scaling Bakeoff (with SLP tokens of course). Who's in?
Avalanche and Sybil resistance
Get a free ticket to Remote Crypto Con, some great BCH discussion happening
Why Read.cash is so important?
Looks A see
Why Bitcoin Cash need the BMP?
Octopus Robots
If you hypothetically had $25,000 in bitcoin and had to turn that into cash anonymously somehow (can't just deposit it into bank account) how would you do it?
Is there an "anti-ABC mob"?
When Should I Buy?
Bitcoin Cash House Singapore
Understanding SEC’s Classification of Crypto-assets: Securities or Commodities?
Doge iMessage Stickers

Let's compete in Reddit's Scaling Bakeoff (with SLP tokens of course). Who's in?

Posted: 20 Jun 2020 07:54 AM PDT

submitted by /u/georgedonnelly
[link] [comments]

Posted: 20 Jun 2020 11:41 AM PDT

When using Avalanche to decide which transactions to include in a block, would there be a good reason to vote against a transaction for which no known double spend exists? I fail to see a reason.

Considering that the vast majority of transactions will not be double spend, wouldn't it be reasonable to demand that a participant who votes against inclusion of a transaction is required to supply proof of an existing double spend? At first sight it seems that this might eliminate a multitude of possibilities to try to mess with the system. Like censoring of transactions by miners as mentioned here.

A simpler system could even take no decision at all in case of a detected double spend. There may be good reasons for a double spend (e.g., a fee that is too low on the original transaction), but in BCH reasonable use cases will probably be rare. So if a double spend is detected, an alternative resolution could be to just wait for a block. (This would reduce the orphan risk for miners that want to include recent "first seen" transactions in a block without waiting for Avalanche.) The only things that seem really important are to (1) disallow inclusion in block of double spends of transactions that have been approved by Avalanche, and (2) to have very fast Avalanche approval for a transaction for which no double spends are known.

Thoughts?

submitted by /u/Htfr
[link] [comments]

Get a free ticket to Remote Crypto Con, some great BCH discussion happening

Posted: 20 Jun 2020 08:04 AM PDT

submitted by /u/Graham_Status
[link] [comments]

Why Read.cash is so important?

Posted: 20 Jun 2020 03:56 AM PDT

submitted by /u/ralaks
[link] [comments]

Looks A see

Posted: 20 Jun 2020 08:22 AM PDT

submitted by /u/rexing21
[link] [comments]

Why Bitcoin Cash need the BMP?

Posted: 20 Jun 2020 06:57 AM PDT

submitted by /u/Ozn0g
[link] [comments]

Octopus Robots

Posted: 20 Jun 2020 09:08 AM PDT

Octopus Robots, growing. The company receives a large number of requests. Just recently Octopus Robots was broadcast on French TV. Therefore COVIR continues to increase its notoriety in the world of crypto-money! With much more news this week !!! Stay tuned.

covir #coronavirus #octopusrobots #bitcointalk #bitcoin# #covid #cvr #share #bfm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMbykBa2A6Y, https://covir.io

submitted by /u/TridentHorn
[link] [comments]

If you hypothetically had $25,000 in bitcoin and had to turn that into cash anonymously somehow (can't just deposit it into bank account) how would you do it?

Posted: 20 Jun 2020 07:23 AM PDT

Asking for a friend.... who hypothetically and unethically breaks TOS by doing hack-related tasks for video gamers (ex. Fortnite skins etc.).... hypothetically lol

submitted by /u/Ocelot859
[link] [comments]

Is there an "anti-ABC mob"?

Posted: 20 Jun 2020 03:07 AM PDT