• Breaking News

    Saturday, February 1, 2020

    Home Unlabelled BTC The original Bitcoin whitepaper by Satoshi mentions “transaction” 69 times, “cash” or “payment” 18 times, “gold” 2 times, and “store of value” 0 times. 🤔🤔🤭

    BTC The original Bitcoin whitepaper by Satoshi mentions “transaction” 69 times, “cash” or “payment” 18 times, “gold” 2 times, and “store of value” 0 times. 🤔🤔🤭

    February 01, 2020

    BTC The original Bitcoin whitepaper by Satoshi mentions “transaction” 69 times, “cash” or “payment” 18 times, “gold” 2 times, and “store of value” 0 times. ������

    The original Bitcoin whitepaper by Satoshi mentions “transaction” 69 times, “cash” or “payment” 18 times, “gold” 2 times, and “store of value” 0 times. ������

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 04:42 PM PST

    Miner donation plan update by Jiang Zhuoer

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 07:20 PM PST

    BTC doesn’t seem to have much happening other than speculation. It would be interesting to see the some stats for BCH.

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 06:19 PM PST

    The value of Bitcoin

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 09:50 PM PST

    Goodbye Greg ��‍♂️ After Wikipedia and Bitcoin Core, Litecoin needs you ... ��

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 05:28 PM PST

    Users paying with Bitcoin Cash at our latest meetup in Maracaibo, Venezuela ����

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 07:30 PM PST

    Gregory Maxwell quits working on Bitcoin Core--More time for trolling now?

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 02:01 PM PST

    Crescent Cash for Desktop now supports SLP tokens!

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 07:26 PM PST

    Five mining entities -- all of them based in China -- control 50% of all computing power on the BTC network

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 06:18 PM PST

    BTC.TOP Mining Pool Founder Offers Updated, New Infrastructure Funding Plan for Bitcoin Cash

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 09:15 PM PST

    Kraken Identifies Critical Flaw in Trezor Hardware Wallets

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 06:44 AM PST

    The Real Reason They Want To Ban Cash. 11 min video. (TLDR: The central banks want total control over you)

    Posted: 01 Feb 2020 12:13 AM PST

    Developer Adds Improvements to the Bitcoin Cash Java Library

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 07:58 PM PST

    Segwit question (don't beat me up for this)

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 06:23 PM PST

    Is there any advantage to avoiding segwit addresses if you are FORCED to transact on BTC chain? Does sticking with only legacy addresses offer any tangible advantage over nested or native segwit addresses? (other than some wallets and services still not recognizing bech32 addresses)

    ​

    I'm not trying to start or add to any argument over whether or not segwit should exist, I'm just curious if there is any reason to actively avoid it when using the BTC chain.

    submitted by /u/takeoveritsyours
    [link] [comments]

    Curious about where all the anti-BCH trolls come from? Undercover reporter reveals life in a Polish troll farm. Paid troll farms are available for hire in almost every country, are cheap, and effective.

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 09:08 AM PST

    You got a problem with the miner tax plan? Here's your REAL problem.

    Posted: 01 Feb 2020 01:13 AM PST

    CashScript v0.3.2 has been released, bringing web support, OutputNullData and more

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 08:25 AM PST

    localbitcoins = a KYC hell hole for us now

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 03:25 AM PST

    localbitcoins has suspended almost 80 percent user accounts from pakistan citing KYC.

    ​

    wtf do they want from us ? naked selfies ? i was already KYC verified there and they shut me down

    ​

    thankfully we have local.bitcoin.com and localethereum.com . business is surviving thanks to these platforms

    ​

    my message to localbitcoins = all your traffic is now going to BCH and ETH platforms

    ​

    --------------------

    submitted by /u/mohtasham22
    [link] [comments]

    Worlds FIRST Bitcoin Cash SLP PvP Telegram Game!! Janken / Rock Paper Scissors! Congrats to the Casa Crew! THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE!

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 11:09 AM PST

    Some Tips on Successfully Raising Funds for Your Bitcoin Project or Company

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 01:30 PM PST

    Censorship: Can the Mods Please Clarify the "No Duplicates" Rule?

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 09:10 AM PST

    Yesterday, I came across a troubling case of censorship on this sub. A hostile and somewhat troll-y post was removed by /u/BitcoinXio citing Rule 5's "no duplicates" policy. The post wasn't removed for being a troll post. We don't have any rule against general trolling and hostility in this sub. I think that's for the best. I hope that everyone here is able to recognize trolling and respond (or not) and vote accordingly.

    Anyway, I want to specifically address the "no duplicates" policy. I completely understand not wanting the sub to be filled up with links to the same article. In that sense, I am 100% onboard with filtering out duplicate link submissions (or redirects that go to the same article, etc.).

    What I am troubled by, however, is applying some sort of "no duplicates" logic to entire topics. How does this sub enforce that rule, and how can we know that it's done consistently? When I pressed /u/BitcoinXio on this point, they simply responded that some duplicate posts escape notice. Why is that? Is /u/BitcoinXio the only mod who enforces this "no duplicate topics" policy? If so, then r/btc needs a lot more mods. We have duplicate topic posts here all the time. For example, let's look at duplicate topic posts in the past month:

    I want to be clear here. I don't think any of these posts should be censored or filtered. My only concern is that we have a rule with dual interpretations being used to censor posts we don't like. We can and should do better.

    submitted by /u/gotamd
    [link] [comments]

    Showerthought: What if the market isn't irrational, and BCH needs to work on decentralization? (Not my opinion, just for discussion).

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 10:22 AM PST

    Honestly I'm surprised that BTC still has such a larger price than BCH. I think sometimes we all feel that way. But this has lasted for quite a few years. I think it's okay to start asking questions about maybe why we are where we are.

    What if the market is just being stubborn about the topic of decentralization? Maybe they see BTC as superior for having so many more nodes (as nodes can UASF against bad-acting miners) and the mining distribution is usually cleaner.

    Is there a way to improve on mining distribution or node count without hurting our own values of fast, cheap, and reliable payments? I have no idea how we'd go about doing it, but I thought maybe I'd ask.

    Edit:

    What if we paid people in SLP tokens to run nodes or mine using ordinary computers? They'd probably make nothing from mining otherwise, but they can receive SLP tokens whether or not they ever find any blocks. With these SLP tokens, maybe they can have access to some kind of a game or p2p digital asset trading platform (like cryptokitties) built on BCH?

    If we could get a million people mining on their home computers (not primarily for BCH, but to be rewarded in SLP tokens), could this have a positive effect on mining decentralization? Edit2: If the average computer runs at 50 mhash, then a million computers only produces 0.00005 exahash (only 0.001% of total hashrate), so possibly not. But having more nodes on the network might at least be cool.

    submitted by /u/J-Stodd
    [link] [comments]

    Bitcoin Cash Privacy Guide

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 02:22 PM PST

    Silk Road Guilty Plea: Dept. of Justice Announced "Key Figure," "Senior Adviser" Faces 20 Years in Prison

    Posted: 31 Jan 2020 06:14 AM PST
    Read more
    at

    No comments:

    Post a Comment