GPU Mining What’s Up With ProgPoW? Benchmarks & Addressing the Criticisms |
| What’s Up With ProgPoW? Benchmarks & Addressing the Criticisms Posted: 27 Feb 2019 02:24 AM PST |
| 5 GPU 1 miner vs split up - different hashrate Posted: 26 Feb 2019 10:24 AM PST Anyone ever see anything like this? I run a 5 GPU mixed rig (A+A+A+B+B). Left side is all 5 GPUs in z-Enemy mining RVN on minermore. Right side is the exact same GPUs, with the batch file split into 2. One miner runs the GPUs of model A and the other instance is running GPU model B so that each instance is running all the same model cards (I'm benchmarking over N=1000 and then dividing results by # of GPUs on that miner). Doesn't do me much good for benchmarking if the hashrate is different depending on the 2 approaches. Plz don't tell me x16r is wild with fluctuation I've been in RVN since March 2018 and I get that - the graph clearly shows a discrete difference, and it doesn't appear to be a readout for only one of the mining instances either since they are both mining to common address and the numbers seem to check out with the sum of both miner readouts. Graph: https://i.imgur.com/F6cN2ng.png Thanks for any help! EDITED: I initially said t-rex instead of z-Enemy. z-Enemy was used for all cases. EDITED AGAIN: The batch file was referencing the wrong miner after all - I had them mislabeled. All I'm seeing is z-Enemy vs t-Rex for x16r (for my specific cards - YMMV). I'll see myself out. [link] [comments]  |
| You are subscribed to email updates from GPU Mining - Ethereum, Z-coins and other Alt-Currency Mining. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment