[Daily Discussion] Sunday, August 05, 2018 Bitcoin Markets |
- [Daily Discussion] Sunday, August 05, 2018
- [Altcoin Discussion] Sunday, August 05, 2018
- Does Bitcoin Dominance Matter To Traders?
- Incoming institutional money effect on the typical btc/alt cycle
- How One Bitcoin Futures Trader Is Fueling The Flash Crash
[Daily Discussion] Sunday, August 05, 2018 Posted: 04 Aug 2018 09:05 PM PDT Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
[link] [comments] |
[Altcoin Discussion] Sunday, August 05, 2018 Posted: 04 Aug 2018 09:06 PM PDT Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
If you're not sure what kind of discussion belongs in this thread, here are some example posts. News, TA, and sentiment analysis are great, too. Other ways to interact:
[link] [comments] |
Does Bitcoin Dominance Matter To Traders? Posted: 05 Aug 2018 06:03 AM PDT Bitcoin dominance is heading towards fifty percent by marketcap. What does this mean for the price and how should traders and investors view it? Marketcap is by far not the best metric to read dominance, but that doesn't mean it can't add value to your trading. A quick podcast with traders explaining how they play the dominance cycle. [link] [comments] |
Incoming institutional money effect on the typical btc/alt cycle Posted: 04 Aug 2018 05:36 PM PDT So it looks like the gateway for institutional money flow into crypto will be bitcoin. * Coinbase Custody Solutions * Baktt * Possible CBOE ETF Bitcoin prices will clearly lead. But what effect do you think this new money flow will have on the usual btc/alt coin cycle? Won't bitcoin have an "ungodly" percentage dominance? [link] [comments] |
How One Bitcoin Futures Trader Is Fueling The Flash Crash Posted: 04 Aug 2018 01:43 PM PDT "A futures trader is playing a role in today's cryptocurrency market slide, as Bitcoin (BTC) dropped 7% to around $7,000, dragging some altcoins into double-digit losses. Hong Kong-based OKEx, the world's second largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume, said it was forced to cover a trade when an anonymous futures trader, who made a wrong-way bet on Bitcoin, was unable to cover losses when Bitcoin's price went down. The enormous long position, worth approximately $416 million, was force-liquidated on July 31. At that time, OKEx released a statement that due to the sheer size of the order, their risk management system could trigger the 'societal loss risk management mechanism.'" [link] [comments] |
You are subscribed to email updates from Sharing of ideas, tips, and strategies for increasing your Bitcoin trading profits. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment